Tag: movie review

Superman (2025): Who Do We Want Superman to Be?

In the past two articles in this three part series, I’ve argued that in past Superman movies, Superman was written as a Christ figure, or someone who emulates an important…

In the past two articles in this three part series, I’ve argued that in past Superman movies, Superman was written as a Christ figure, or someone who emulates an important aspect or aspects of Christ’s character, mission or identity. For the newest movie, Superman (2025), I’ve made the case that this Superman is not a Christ figure, and is instead more of a humanist or existentialist exemplar.

But, so what? So what if this Superman is more humanist than messianic? For those that enjoyed the movie (and I certainly did too), this whole article might seem like another pointless addition to the never ending culture war. Superman (2025) is supposed to be a fun summer movie that you enjoy for the visuals and don’t think too deeply about. Right?

The truth is, very few (if any) instances of art and media are truly neutral, philosophically speaking. The significant changes to Superman’s origins and character were clearly deliberate. And if deliberate, then they were likely motivated by a philosophical stance or agenda. Our art, including “fun summer movies”, shapes us and forms us as people. The messages in our movies, shows and literature inform and influence our worldviews. So as Christians, we need to be constantly mindful and vigilant of all the implicit messages that any story, even the fun and silly ones, is trying to communicate. 

Christian Existentialism

So what do we do with this new Superman? Must Superman be a Christ figure to be acceptable? First, it must be said that existentialism isn’t an inherently bad philosophy. There were some Christian existentialists, such as Søren Kierkegaard, Blaise Pascal and Fyodor Dostoevsky. They generally upheld the importance of personal choice. Pascal, for example, is famous for “Pascal’s Wager”, which encourages people to believe in God even in the absence of evidence, as rejecting God could have dire consequences. 

And some existentialist views do correspond to Christian teachings. Existentialism teaches that your choices make you what you are. We can find a similar theme in 2 Peter 1:3-11. Here, Peter tells us that though God has “given us everything we need for a godly life”, we are to “make every effort” to complement our faith with various spiritual virtues. These virtues “will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ”. Whoever does not have them is “nearsighted and blind”. So in some sense, we are responsible for the formation of our own character, and it is up to us (though of course with the help of God’s grace) to make the right choices in order to be a virtuous person. 

This means that there are many positive lessons to learn from Superman (2025). Just like Clark, none of us have a choice when it comes to the parents we have, or the situation we are born into. But we can make the right choices despite our origins, as Clark did. No matter how ungodly or godly our household was during our childhoods, for example, it is up to each of us individually to accept God’s free gift of salvation and choose to obey Him. 

Sisyphus or Savior?

On the other hand, Superman has long been a prominent Christ figure (at least in the movies). One less Christ figure in media means even less Christian influence in contemporary entertainment. And Superman (2025) is not alone. Shows like Invincible and The Boys turn “superman” figures into ruthless conquerors or morally bankrupt, egocentric frauds. These shows teach that you can’t trust the Christ figures. Rather, people must abandon hope in salvation from above and embrace the existentialist idea that you can only save yourself. 

Maybe we as Christians don’t want every single character in our media to be just another flawed human being. Maybe we do want Christ figures in our films, shows and literature. At least, we might sometimes want stronger, more explicit Christian themes in our entertainment rather than just generic ethical messages that can apply to any worldview. The less Christ figures we have in our media, the less interested our culture might become in Christ. The more the gospel gets squeezed out of our stories, the more our entertainment becomes the salt that has lost its taste, or the light which is hidden under a basket. 

Maybe Superman doesn’t have to be messianic for us to enjoy him. But surely we want some character out there to remind us of Christ. 

No Comments on Superman (2025): Who Do We Want Superman to Be?

Superman (2025): Who is Superman Now?

In the last article, we saw that Christian theology heavily influenced Superman’s origin story and character in past movies. Superman’s benevolent parents send him to guide humanity and be a…

In the last article, we saw that Christian theology heavily influenced Superman’s origin story and character in past movies. Superman’s benevolent parents send him to guide humanity and be a “light” to them. 

Superman (2025) turns this Christian message on its head. At first, it seems as though Clark’s Kryptonian parents are exactly like the Jor-El and Lara (Superman’s mother) of past portrayals. In the Fortress of Solitude, Superman’s Arctic base, Clark listens to a message from his parents. This message definitely seems messianic. Lara explains, “we have searched the universe for a home where you can do the most good and live out Krypton’s truth.” Jor-El then says, “that place is Earth”. Unfortunately, the message is damaged and only a portion of it can be played. 

So far, so good, right? Well, it turns out that Superman’s parents didn’t really have the best intentions in mind for Earth. Superman’s nemesis Lex Luthor later exposes the missing portion of Jor-El and Lara’s message, revealing a sinister, imperialist plot. 

Jor-El tells his son, “The people there (Earth) are simple and profoundly confused, weak of mind and spirit and body.” So Jor-El commands Superman to “lord over the planet as the last son of Krypton” and to “rule without mercy”. Lara twists the knife with this spectacular advice: “Dispatch of anyone unable or unwilling to serve you, Kal-El. Take as many wives as you can so your genes and Krypton’s might and legacy will live on in this new frontier.”  

Message Denied

Obviously, Clark and the denizens of Earth don’t receive this message so well. So, a distraught Clark turns to his adoptive human father, Jonathan Kent, for advice. Jonathan, in a tenderhearted tone that reflects his down-to-earth wisdom, tells his son that “parents aren’t for telling their children who they’re supposed to be”. 

We can already see how Superman (2025) changes Clark’s Christian origins somewhat radically. Instead of godlike, benevolent parental figures, Clark’s Kryptonian parents are chauvinistic and authoritarian. Clark’s messianic mission is nothing more than an imperialist plot. And we learn that not only should Clark’s biological parents be rejected as moral guides, but actually no parent should tell their children who they’re supposed to be (including divine parents?). It’s not hard to see how these are all significant departures from the Superman of previous films. 

Superman turns more humanist as Jonathan Kent reveals more of his philosophy of identity. Jonathan says, “Your choices, Clark. Your actions. That’s what makes you who you are.”

Sartre’s Superman

Students of existentialism will recognize this message very quickly. It is the classic existentialist motto, “existence precedes essence”. Existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre taught that the fact that you exist (existence) comes before facts about what you are (essence). In other words, you start off in the world as an existing thing, but we have no idea what kind of thing or person you are. Why? Because it is your own choices that define what or who you are. Until you start making your own choices and defining who you are for yourself, you are a blank slate, and your essence is indeterminate. 

In his book Existentialism is a Humanism, Sartre explains his philosophy in detail. He writes, “What do we mean by saying that existence precedes essence? (…) If man as the existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of himself”.

This view sharply diverges from traditional philosophy, which holds that essence precedes existence. For example, there is such a thing as a universal “human nature” which human beings participate in or take on when they are conceived. But Sartre writes, “there is no human nature, because there is no God to have a conception of it”. Beyond rejecting traditional philosophy, this statement illuminates the atheistic element of Sartre’s existentialism. It also closely relates to Superman’s origins in Superman (2025). 

Kryptonian Enlightenment

As we saw, in stark contrast to the previous Superman films, Superman does not have benevolent, quasi-divine parents to define his identity and mission for him. His parents, like all forms of “organized religion”, turn out to be moral frauds, and Clark must cast their teachings aside. Since he has no guide (like Sartre has no God), Clark must figure out the meaning of life for himself.

As Clark himself declares to his nemesis Lex Luthor at the climax of the movie, “I’m as human as anyone. I love, I get scared. I wake up every morning, and despite not knowing what to do, I put one foot in front of the other, and I try to make the best choices I can. I screw up all the time. But that is being human. And that’s my greatest strength.” 

Maybe nobody created Superman’s new origin story with an anti-religion or anti-theist agenda. But it’s still telling that Superman (2025) not only replaces Superman’s Christian origins and mission, but conspicuously and intentionally subverts them. 

No Comments on Superman (2025): Who is Superman Now?

Running Towards Reality: A Review of Blade Runner 2049

I was delighted to find that Villeneuve delivered a worthy successor in Blade Runner 2049.

The cult classic Blade Runner is arguable one of the most influential films in cinema. It has inspired countless directors and movies, and is studied extensively in film schools. Making a sequel to such a film is a risky venture, but I was delighted to find that Villeneuve delivered a worthy successor in Blade Runner 2049. Villeneuve effectively captures the mood and aesthetic of Blade Runner through the stunning cinematography of Roger Deakins (hopefully this will finally earn him a much deserved Oscar for best cinematography), and evocative score of Benjamin Wallfisch and Hans Zimmer. Villaneuve follows and builds on the themes of the original film without retreading. Villaneuve extracts superb performances from all his actors with Harrison Ford giving one of his best performances ever.

Villeneuve effectively captures the mood and aesthetic of Blade Runner through the stunning cinematography of Roger Deakins (hopefully this will finally earn him a much deserved Oscar for best cinematography), and evocative score of Benjamin Wallfisch and Hans Zimmer. Villaneuve follows and builds on the themes of the original film without retreading. Villaneuve extracts superb performances from all his actors with Harrison Ford giving one of his best performances ever.

It is refreshing for a director to take long cuts, and to linger the camera on the actors and scenes, but there are places where the movie could be tightened up for a shorter run time. Blade Runner is rated R for some strong language, violence, and some unnecessary nudity.

Blade Runner 2049 is an excellent film. It is meant to be seen on the biggest screen one can find. It is as good as the original, and some could argue that it surpasses its predecessor. I recommend it to those who enjoy thoughtful and original sci-fi films.

Spoilers follow….

There are so many ways one could go in discussing the deep philosophical and thematic currents of Blade Runner 2049. What is a soul? What does it mean to be human? What does it mean to be free? These are just some of the questions raised and explored in Blade Runner. Blade Runner does not provide trite solutions to such difficult problems. It invokes without answering in full. The most compelling question raised in Blade Runner revolves around the simple question, “what is real?”

This theme is pops up constantly in the dialogue. “We’re all just looking out for something real;” “I have memories, but I can’t tell if they’re real;” “It’s real. Someone lived this;” “is he real? I don’t know, ask him;” “I know what’s real.” The noetic effects of the fall are painted all over the screen. One cannot always be sure who is human or replicant (thankfully 2049 leaves open whether Deckard is or not). K cannot even trust his own memories, because they could have been manufactured and implanted. K at one point comes to believe that he is one person, only to later find out he is not who he thinks he is.

Worldviews present descriptions about the nature of reality. They make truth claims over what is real and what is not. In different ways Blade Runner 2049 ask us what does it mean to be human, what is the soul, what is right and wrong, and what is love? It displays a deep longing for real true loving relationships. I submit that other worldviews give bad answers to these fundamental questions, but in Christianity we find the fullest, richest, most accurate picture of reality.

We find a world in which there is objective truth, goodness, and beauty. It does not hide from evil nor deny its existence, but instead confronts evil. Christianity demands justice for evils committed, but desires mercy and grace for the weak and repentant. It affirms the soul and intrinsic worth of every person’s life. It revels in the awe of the grandeur of the natural world. It longs for restoration and reconciliation. Christianity puts all its hopes in a historic fact of a resurrection. It tells us that there is more to life than just this. Christianity answers all of these questions in the person of Jesus Christ who is the way, the truth, and the life; the image of the invisible God; the radiance of God’s glory and the exact expression of his nature.

In asking the question, what is real, we express our longing to know who we can trust. K could not trust his own memories. He found more real connection with a hologram than with people. He questioned whether a dog was real or not. Blade Runner 2049 pushes us to ask who or what can we trust. Christianity answers that in Jesus we find the ultimate trustworthy one who will never lie. The enemy comes to deceive, but Jesus is the light who reveals all truth. In him we discover what is real.

“In asking the question, what is real, we express our longing to know who we can trust. The enemy comes to deceive, but Jesus is the light who reveals all truth. In him we discover what is real.”

 

Comments Off on Running Towards Reality: A Review of Blade Runner 2049

Caesar: The Simian Moses?

War of the Planet of the Apes emotional power is the use of the Exodus narrative structure. Caesar’s story affects us because we recognize within his story our story. We long for rescue and a promise land where we can be free.

Amid mostly mediocre blockbuster fare, War for Planet of the Apes shines. Director and co-writer Matt Reeves has crafted the best movie of the summer. War for Planet of the Apes concludes the Caesar trilogy and in my opinion will eventually be considered one of the greatest trilogies of this generation.

Caesar, the sentient ape and central protagonist is one of the most complex characters in film. Andy Serkis is brilliant as the noble and wise, but war-weary leader Caesar. Thanks to cinematographer, Michael Seresin, War for Planet of the Apes is absolutely stunning, providing a very different look from most blockbusters.  I cannot recommend this movie enough. Please go see it in theaters, we need more movies like this.

Spoilers Follow…

There are so many things I could comment on for War of the Planet of the Apes but it feels appropriate to focus on Caesar. Reeves is clearly drawing from a number of stories such as Apocalypse Now and Clint Eastwood westerns, but the strongest seems to be from the biblical Moses. Caesar gives the law, for example “ape no kill ape.” The apes are forced into backbreaking slavery to build an artifice for the humans, much in the same way the Israelites were forced into slavery by the Egyptians. When Caesar sees one ape being cruelly whipped, he stops it by speaking out, similar to how Moses speaks out for his people.  Caesar leads his people out of captivity. The enemies of Caesar are wiped away by a sea of snow. Caesar leads his people through a desert to a promise land. Caesar’s anger causes Caesar to fail, which leads to him being mortally wounded. Therefore Caesar sits atop a hill and looks out onto the promise land, but does not enter it, much in the same manner Moses’s anger prevents him from being allowed into the kingdom. Caesar is a simian Moses.

Part of War of the Planet of the Apes emotional power is the use of the Exodus narrative structure. Caesar’s  story affects us because we recognize within his story our story. There too is a war in our souls between mercy and revenge. We innately know the exilic story. We are held captive by our sinful nature, oppression, and death. We long for rescue and a promise land where we can be free.

The Bible story points us to our need. We are exiled captives caught in our sin. In Jesus, as with Caesar and Moses, we find a hero who came to set the captive free. Jesus is our savior who lifts us out of our fears, sinfulness, and oppression. Jesus will lead us into the ultimate promise land. Where Caesar and Moses failed, Jesus does not fail. In Jesus mercy and justice meet. We resonate with Caesar because many of his desires are our own. He draws on our recognition that there is something wrong with this world. Caesar represents our desires for mercy, justice, peace, and rest. The biblical story reveals to us that only in Jesus our exilic narrative will find complete resolution. Where the promise land of War of the Planet of the Apes is fleeting, through Jesus we will enter an eternal promise land where we will be free and find rest.

“We are exiled captives caught in our sin. In Jesus, as with Caesar and Moses, we find a hero who came to set the captive free. Jesus is our savior who lifts us out of our fears, sinfulness, and oppression. Jesus will lead us into the ultimate promise land. Where Caesar and Moses failed, Jesus does not fail.”

Comments Off on Caesar: The Simian Moses?

Type on the field below and hit Enter/Return to search